Next: Automatic and Semi-automatic Segmentation
Up: Segmentation and Labeling
Previous: Segments vs. Points-in-Time
Contents
``Manual segmentation refers to the process whereby an expert transcriber segments
and labels a speech file by hand, referring only to the spectrogram and/or
waveform. [...] The manual method is
believed to be more accurate. Also, the use of a human transcriber ensures that
the segment boundaries and labels (at least at the narrow phonetic level) are
perceptually valid. However, there is a need for explicit segmentation criteria
to ensure both inter- and intra-transcriber consistency, together with (ideally)
some form of checking procedure. Sets of guidelines for manual segmentation have
been developed by various projects. One such is Hieronymus et al. (1990), which
uses the four levels of underlying phonemic, broad phonetic, narrow phonetic and
acoustic. It also retains the same base phonemic symbol even at the acoustic
level, to facilitate the automatic determination of boundaries at the phonetic
level once the boundaries at the acoustic level have been determined. One should
not expect more than 90% agreement between experts.''
(From [2], p. 152.)
The basic principles that were listed in section
apply also for the manual
segmentation and labeling. You should focus on a consistent training of
the segmenters and labelers to maximize inter-labeler agreement (see
also section
.
Next: Automatic and Semi-automatic Segmentation
Up: Segmentation and Labeling
Previous: Segments vs. Points-in-Time
Contents
BITS Projekt-Account
2004-06-01